2. Schmeling A, Dettmeyer R, Rudolf E, Vieth V, Geserick G. Forensic Age Estimation. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016; 113(4): 44-50.
3. Igbigbi PS and Msamati BC. Ischio- pubic index in adult black Malawians. East Afr Med J. 2000; 77(9): 514-516
4. Best KC, Garvin HM,Cabo LL. An investigation into the relationship between human cranial and pelvic sexual dimorphism. J Forensic Sci. 2018; 63(4):
990-1000.
5. Khangura RK, Sircar K, Singh S, Rastogi V. Sex determination using mesiodistal dimension of permanent maxillary incisors and canines. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2011; 3(2): 81-85.
6. Oner Z, Turan MK, Oner S, Secgin Y, Sahin B. Sex estimation using sternum part lengths by means of artificial neural networks. Forensic Sci Int. 2019; 301(1):
6-11.
7. Sagun S, Pawan KM, Preeti A, Sumita S. A Morphometric study of different parameters of greater sciatic notch relation to sexual dimorphism in north Indian population. Eur J Mol Clin Med. 2022; 9(1): 1435-1438.
8. Spradley MK. Metric methods for the biological profile in forensic anthropology: Sex, ancestry, and stature. Acad Forensic Pathol. 2016; 6(3): 391-
399.
9. Saluja S, Tigga SR, Das SS, Thakur A. Determination of sexual dimorphism of the human sacrum based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of morphometric parameters. Cureus. 2023; 15(5): e38629.
10. Baumgarten SE and Kenyon-Flatt B. Metric methods for estimating sex utilizing the pelvis. In sex estimation of the human skeleton. Klales, A.R., Ed.; Academic Press: London, UK. 2020; 171–184.
11. Bruzek J, Santos F, Dutailly B, Murail P, Cunha E. Validation and reliability of the sex estimation of the human os coxae using freelyavailable DSP2 software for bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2017; 164(2): 440-449.
12. Sangchay N, Dzetkulicova V, Zuppello M, Chetsawang J. Consideration of accuracy and observational error analysis in pelvic sex assessment: A study in a Thai cadaveric human population. Siriraj Med J. 2022; 74(5):330-339.
13. Saini V, Srivastava R, Rai RK, Shamal SN, Singh TB, Tripathi SK.Mandibular ramus: An indicator for sex in fragmentary mandible. J Forensic Sci. 2011; 56(1): S13-16.
14. Abdallah RS, El Sayed HR, Abdel Moawed DMN. Forensic assessment of sex using pelvic x-rays in Libyan Population in Tripoli. Zagazig J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2021; 19(1): 91-101.
15. Harper LM, Odibo AO, Stamilio DM,Macones GA. Radiographic measures of the mid pelvis to predict cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 208(6): 460.e1-460.e6.
16. Verbruggen SW and Nowlan NC. Ontogeny of the Human Pelvis. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2017; 300(4): 643-652.
17. Thamires M and Vanessa S. Contributions of anatomy to forensic sex estimation: focus on head and neck bones. Forensic Sci Res. 2022; 7(1): 11-23.
18. Njeze NR, Agwu-Umahi O, Ezeofor SN, Arinze-Onyia S, Njeze NC, Akpagbula DU, Madu K. Reduced bone mineral density in nigerian women: A prevalence study. Niger J Orthop Trauma. 2019; 18(1): 9-12.
19. Lusted LB and Keat TE. The lower extremities: atlas of roentgenographic measurement. Yearbook Med. Publisher, London, England. 1978; 165.
20. Kanika S, Rajan KS, Gurdeep K. Role of subpubic angle in sexual dimorphism & its clinical importance: a morphometric study in adult human bony pelvis. Int J Anat Res. 2016; 4(4): 3166-3169.
21. Akhlaghi M, Bakhttavar K, Mokhtari T, Mehdizadeh F, Parsa VA, Farahani MV et al, Using subpubic angle in sex determination and stature estimation: An anthropometric study on Iranian adult population. Int J Med Toxicol Forensic Med. 2017; 7(4): 195-202.
22. Badawi K, Awad A, Seddeg Y. The normal subpubic angle in adult Sudanese population. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2018; 17(1): 60-63.
23. Mohammed RA and Awad KA. Association of subpubic angle measurement with age and gender in a group of adult Sudanese patients. Sudan J Med Sci. 2020; 15(3): 281-289.
24. Ali DM and Fouad FA. Sex identification and reconstruction of length of humerus from its fragments: An Egyptian study, Egypt J Forensic Sci. 2016; 6(2): 48-55.
25. Kayastha P, Suwal S, Shrestha L, Paudel S, Shrestha SL, Joshi P. Measurement of Subpubic Angle in Radiograph. Nepal J Radiol. 2020; 10(16): 22-25.
26. Pandit R,Adhikari A, Upadhyay HP. Mean subpubic angle of patients visiting department of radiodiagnosis of a tertiary care hospital: a descriptive cross- sectional study. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2022; 60(246): 142-145.
27. Oladipo GS, Ugboma HAA, Suleiman YA. Comparative study of the sub-pubic angles of adult Ijaws and Igbos. Asian J Med Sci. 2009; 1(2): 26-29.
28. Anyanwu GE, Agu AU, Esom EA, Obikili EN, Eze BI, Egwu OC. Relationship of sub-pubic angle with the various femoral head diameters amongst Igbos of Nigeria. South Pac J Technol Sci. 2014; 2(2): 319-324
29. Ali SHM, Omar N, Shafie MS, Ismail NAN, Hadi H, Nor FM. Sex estimation using subpubic angle from reconstructed three-dimensional computed tomography pelvic model in a contemporary Malaysian population. Anat Cell Biol. 2020; 53(1): 27-35.
30. Memarian A, Aghakhani K, Mehrpisheh S, Fares F. Gender determination from diagnostic factors on anteroposterior pelvic radiographs. J Chin Med Assoc. 2017; 80(3): 161-168.
31. Mahmoud SF, Al Fadaly NM, Abdel Samie HA, Abdel Halim GE,Abdel Rahman AZ. A morphometric and statistical study for determination of sex from certain bony pelvic parameters in Assiut Governorate by using plain x-ray films. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2019; 76(5): 4068-4076.
32. Setiawati R, Rahardjo P, Ruriana I, Guglielmi G. Anthropometric study using three-dimensional pelvic CT scan in sex determination among adult Indonesian population. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2022; 19(1): 24-33.
- Abstract viewed - 24 times
- PDF downloaded - 9 times
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright
© GK Ekpewu, JE Jaiyeoba-ojigho, DEO Eboh, 2025
Affiliations
GK Ekpewu
Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, Delta State, University, Abraka, Nigeria
JE Jaiyeoba-ojigho
Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, Delta State, University, Abraka, Nigeria
DEO Eboh
Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, Delta State, University, Abraka, Nigeria
How to Cite
Sex Determination using Radiographic Measurement of Pelvic Angles in Delta State University Teaching Hospital, Oghara, Nigeria
Vol 11 No 1 (2025): International Journal of Forensic Medical Investigation
Submitted: Jun 19, 2025
Published: Jun 8, 2025
Abstract
Background:
The pelvic bone is the most reliable sexually dimorphic bone in humans, and most accurate in determining age and sex
Materials and Methods
This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the Radiology Department of Delta State University Teaching Hospital, Oghara, Nigeria. Pelvic radiographs of 175 males and 169 females, aged 25 to 50 years were used to measure angles in degrees. Data obtained was statistically analysed using GraphPad Prism. Basic descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation and range) summarised data. Independent sample t-test, paired sample t-test, pearson’s correlation and multiple logistic regression analysis were conducted with statistical significance pegged at p-value < 0.05.
Results
There were significant sex differences in all pelvic angles. Right pubic ramus angle and left pubic ramus angle were significantly higher (p-value < 0.05) in males while subpubic angle, right X angle and left X angle were significantly higher (p-value < 0.05) in females. Significant side difference was observed in bilateral pelvic angles except for X angle in males. There was no association between the pelvic angles and age. Sex can be accurately determined applying multiple logistic regression models with subpubic angle and X angles serving as better sex predictors.
Conclusion
Male pelvis has a greater pubic ramus angle than females, whereas female pelvis has greater subpubic and X angles than males. The subpubic angle and X angles revealed impressive accuracy levels in sex determination, exceeding eighty percent.