2. Campbell, N. A. and Reece, J. B. Biology. San Francisco, comparative anatomy: Benjamin Cummings 2002;18: 438- 439.
3. Hardison, R. C. "Comparative genomics". Plos Biology2003; 1(2): 58.
4. Clarys, P., Deliens, T., Huybrechts, I., Deriemaeker, P., Vanaelst, B., De Keyzer, W.,Hebbelinck, M. and Mullie, P. Comparison of nutritional quality of the vegan, vegetarian, semi-vegetarian, pesco- vegetarian and omnivorous dietry. nutrients 2014; 6(3): 1318–1332.
5. Petherick, C. J., Duncan, I. J. H., Erhard, H. W., Lay, D. C., Mench, J. A. and O′sConnor, C. E. Guidelines for ethical use of animal behavioural science. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 2003; 81: 291- 305.
6. Kiyoshi, H. and Inoue A. Comparative histological study of teleost livers in relation to phylogeny. Zoological Sciences 2004; 21:841-50.
7. Odokuma, E. I. and Omokaro, E. I. Comparative histologic anatomy of vertebrate liver. Annals of Bioanthropology 2017; 3: 1-5.
8. Drury, R. A. B., Wallington, E. A. and Cameron, R. Carletons Histological Techniques. 4th Edition Oxford University Press 1967;4: 33- 138.
9. Burnett, D. and Crocker, J. The science laboratory diagnosis. 2nd edition 2005; p34- 38.
10. Madhan, K. E. and Raju, S. Comparative histology of human and cow, goat and sheep liver. Journal of Surgical Academia2014; 4(1): 10– 13.
11. Valentina, C., Allassia, D. G., Francesca, V.,
Rainer, S. and Cinzia, D. Immunohistochemical aspects of ito and kupffer cells in the liver of domesticated aspects of ito and kupffer cells in the liver of domesticated and wild ruminants. Open journal of veterinary medicine2012;2: 129- 136.
12. Shilpa, S. M. Gross anatomy, histology and histochemistry of the liver in goat. Marathwada Agricultural University Journal2001; 2: 234- 247.
13. Sylva, S. M. Human Biology. 7th edition.
McGraw-Hill Company Incorporated New
York2002; 7: 30- 31.
14. Baratta, J. L., Ngo A., Lopez B.,
Kasabwalla, N., Longmuir, K. J. and Robertson R. T. Cellular organization of normal mouse liver: A histological, quantitative immunocytochemical, and fine structural analysis. Histochemistry and Cell Biology2009; 131(6): 713–726.
15. Roth, A. and Wake, J. Development and evolution of plethodontidsalamansers: a review of prior studies and a prospectus for future research. Journal of Experimental Zoology1989; 230(23): 175-186.
16. Iwasaki, S. Evolution of the structure and function of the vertebrate tongue. Journal of Anataomy. 2002; 10(21): 1732- 1739.
17. Adeeyo, O. A., Caxton-martin, E. A., Ofusori, D. A., Ashamu, E. A., Omotoso ,E. O., Odukoya, S. A. and Yusuf U. A. Comparative histological features of the pancreas in fruit-eating Bat (Eidolon— Helvon) and pangolin (Manis tricuspid). Journal of Cell and Animal Biology 2008;2(6): 134-139.
18. Abayomi, T. A., Ofusori, D. A., Ayoka, O. A., Odukoya, S. A., Omotoso, E. O., Amegor, F. O., Ajayi, A. A., Ojo, G. B. and Oluwayinka, O. P. A comparative histological study of the tongue of rat (Rattusnorvegicus), bat (Eidolon helvum) and pangolin (Manistricuspis). International Journal of Morphology2009; 27(4): 1111- 1119.
19. El-Fattah, A. B. and El-Beltagy, M. Comparative studies on the tongue of white –throated kingfisher (halcyon Smymensis)
and common buzzard (buteaButeo) Egypt.
Academic Journal of Biological
sciences2013; 4(1): 1-14.
20. Baird, G. D., Lomax, M. A., Symonds, H.
W. and Shaw, S. R. Net hepatic and splanchnic metabolism of lactate, pyruvate and propionate in dairy cows in vivo in relation to lactation and nutrient supply. Biochemical Journals1980; 186: 47–57.
24. Hirst, K. K. The history of the domestication of goats. About.com2008.
25. Larson, G., Piperno, D. R., Allaby, R. G., Purugganan, M. D. Andersson, L. Current perspective and the future of domestication studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences2014; 111(17): 6139- 6146.
26. Adronie V. and Myriam H. Cats and carbohydrates: the carnivore fantassy? Journal of Veterinary Sciences2017; 4:55-
21. Reynolds, C. K., Huntington, G. B., Tyrrell,
H. F. and Reynolds, P. J. Net portal-drained
visceral and hepatic metabolism of glucose, 59.
L-lactate, and nitrogenous compounds in lactating holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Sciences1988; 71: 1803– 1812.
22. Schermerhorn, T. Normal glucose metabolism in carnivores overlaps with diabetes pathology in non-carnivores. Researchgate Journal2014; 2: 124- 142.
23. Darwin, C. The variation of animals and plants under domestication. London. John Murray1868.
27. Zoran, D. L. The carnivore connection to nutrition in cats. Journal of Anatomical Veterinary Medical Association2002; 221: 1559– 1567.
28. Buffington, C. A. Dry foods and risk of disease in cats. Canine Vetenary Journal2008; 49: 561–563.
29. Laflamme, D. P. Letter to the editor: Cats and carbohydrates. TopCompanion Animal Medical2008; 23: 159- 160.
30. Verbrugghe, A., Hesta, M., Daminet, S. and Janssens, G. P. Nutritional modulation of insulin resistance in the true carnivorous cat: A review. CritIcal Review Food Science. Nutrition2012; 52: 172– 182.
31. Rand, J. S., Fleeman, L. M., Farrow, H. A., Appleton, D. J. and Lederer, R. Canine and feline diabetes mellitus: Nature or nurture? Journal of Nutritional Science2004; 134: 2072-2080.
32. Bergman E. N. Energy contributions of volatile fatty acids from the gastrointestinal tract in various species. Physiology Revision1990; 70(2): 567-590.
33. Young, J. W. Gluconeogenesis in cattle: significance and methodology. Journal of Dairy Sciences1977; 60: 1– 15.
34. Donkin, S. S. and Armentano, L. E. Insulin and glucagon regulation of gluconeogenesis in preruminating and ruminating bovine. Journal of Animal Science 1995; 73: 546– 551.
35.
Smith, K. L., Waldron, M. R., Ruzzi, L. C., Drackley, J. K., Socha, M. T. and Overton, T. R. Metabolism of dairy cows as affected by prepartum dietary carbohydrate source and supplementation with chromium throughout the periparturient period. Journal of Dairy Science2008; 91: 2011– 2020.
Jalc, D. Z., Varadyova, A., Laukova, P., Homolka K. and Jancik, F. Effect of inoculated corn silage on rumen fermentation and lipid metabolism in an artificial rumen (RUSITEC). Animal Feed Science Technology2009; 152: 256-266. Khaing, K. T., Loh, T. C., Ghizan, S., Jahromi, M. F., Halim R. A. and Samsudin, A. A. Profiling of Rumen Fermentation and Microbial Population Changes in Goats Fed with Napier Grass Supplemented with Whole Corn Plant Silage. Asian Journal of Animal Sciencesi 2016; 10: 1-14.
Benevenga J. N. Nutrient requirements of laboratory animals. Fourth (Revised Ed.) National academies press (US)1995.
39. Nakane, P. K. and Kavvao1, A. Peroxidase labeled antibody, a new method of conjugation. Journal Hisroc/rein. Cytochemistry1974; 22: l084- 1091.
40. Gay S., Fietzek P P., Remberger K., Eder M.
and Kuhn K. Liver cirrhosis: immunofiuorescence and biochemical studies demonstrate two types of collagen. Klin. Wochenschr 1975; 53: 205-208.
41. Remberger, K., Gay, S. and Fietzek, P. P. Immunhistochernischeuntersuchungenzurkol lagencharakterisierung in lebercirrhosen.VirchowsArchivers Pathology. Ana. Hisroi1975; 367: 23l- 240.
42. Kent, G., Gay, S., Inouye, T., Bai-iu, R.., Minick, O. T. and Popper H. Vitamin A- containing lipocytes and formation of type III collagen in liver injury. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1976; 73: 3719-3722
43. Seyer, J. M., Hutcheson, E. T. and Kang A. H. Collagen polymorphism in normal and cirrhotic human liver. Journal Clinical Investigation 1977; 59: 241- 248.
44. Konomi, H., Sano, J. and Nagai, Y. Immunohistochemical localization of type I, III and IV (basement membrane) collagens in the Iiver. Acra Par Japan1981; 31: 973- 978.
- Abstract viewed - 775 times
- PDF downloaded - 584 times
Copyright
© ,
Affiliations
Udodi P. S
. Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria
Odokuma E. I
Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria
How to Cite
A comparative histochemical/histomorphologic assessment of the hepatic architecture in mammals
Vol 4 No 1 (2018): Volume 4 Number 1
Submitted: Jul 4, 2019
Published: Apr 2, 2018
Abstract
Introduction: The mammalian liver is a functional and morphological complex organ with common histological features across different species. The mild variations in the mammalian liver were attributed to speciesadaptational changes, dietary habit, specific metabolic activities, and phylogenic organizational peculiarities.The previous studies on mammalian liver were not based on the macromolecules of the liver and could not provide detailed histological associations between herbivores, carnivores and omnivores of mammalian class. This study aimed to provide detailed histological association between the livers of six mammalian species.
Methodology: Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Research and Bioethics Committee, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, Delta State University, Abraka (RBC/FBMS/DELSU/18/26). Six animals of mammalian species were utilized for this study in line with the guidelines for the care and use of animals for research.
Observations: A common trend was observed in the histological features of the liver across the six mammalian species studied: common histo-architectural features, distribution of glycoprotein, glycolipid and collagen type III were observed in the liver across the six mammalian species. Intermittent distribution of glycogen was observed in the liver of cow and high presence of glycogen was also observed in dog liver on oppose to their dietary classification.
Conclusion: This research work has established a strong histological association in the liver of three groups of mammals, based on their diet. The work has been able to provide histochemical evidence of the existence of a near phylogenetic relationship between the six species of mammals, studied.
Keywords: Mammal; Liver; Histoachitectural; Adaptation; Histology, Phylogeny